ALL THE GOVERNMENT HAS TO OFFER IS WHAT THEY TAKE FROM YOU. ; )

Monday, January 11, 2010

"Predicting" the past, hot enough for blizzards



Below is a link to a very good article from a UK newspaper about gobal cooling. It gives a nice overview of the current debate about the causes of the most recent cooling cycle, 1999-present. Incredibly, they also reveal that a top global warming scientist "predicted" in 2008 that we would be in a cooling cycle, a mere 9 years after it started.

www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1242011/DAVID-ROSE-The-mini-ice-age-starts-here.html

Where can I sign up to make money predicting things that have been going on for almost a decade? It sounds like no brain cells were harmed in the making of that prediction. At least, after a decade, they have started to give a halfway intelligent reason for why their models were completely wrong and we are cooling at the time they said we would be boiling alive. The whole "so hot it's cold" thing wasn't working for them.

Just for fun, let's review their excuses so far for the unexpected global cooling:

1. It's not happening, not real.

2. It's part of a natural cycle.

3. It's happening because it's so darn hot that it's cold. (Haven't you heard of freezer burn? Duh. Cold but still burns.)

4. Just because it's colder all over the world doesn't mean it's colder globally. (Huh?)

5. It has actually gotten much hotter except for a few select spots, namely over the land...oh, and over the oceans.

No comments:

Post a Comment