ALL THE GOVERNMENT HAS TO OFFER IS WHAT THEY TAKE FROM YOU. ; )

Saturday, March 13, 2010

I know better than you, comrade


Just for fun I'm going to make fun of the socialists again. If they weren't causing so much suffering and damage I would feel like a bully for pointing out how destructive and completely idiotic their beliefs are.

Let's start at the most basic level. Newsflash: they do not believe in a free market. Therefore they believe in an unfree market. So, instead of everyone being able to decide for themselves what they should do when they need toothpaste, need to find a job, or are shopping for a car, they believe there should not be freedom for the individual to make their own choices. Why is that? What do they propose replacing it with?

You aren't going to believe this, but they say that it makes more sense for strangers, bureaucrats, DMV clerks in a faraway city to make those decisions for you. This is one of the insane basic premises of socialism. Humans are incapable of making good decisions for themselves, so humans should make decisions for people they don't know! I'm serious. What do you think the explosion in government workers, and truly shocking amount of control of the individual is about? That's it. Strangers can do a better job with your life than you can. Not only that, you should not be given the opportunity to run your life.

How is it that those strangers, who are humans, have a gift for running your life, but presumably can't run their own. How could that make sense? And frankly, how could they possibly have enough information to do an adequate job??? Really. How? And more important is the next question. Since they always want us to change from a system where people can make their own decisions to one where strangers take that ability away from them, why should we go to the trouble to do that? Whether they could figure out a way to do an adequate job or not, how could it possibly be better and justify the effort to change to a different system with much higher taxes and much bigger government, etc?

Since that's a tough sell, maybe that's why they recognize the need to "eliminate" 20% of the population in order to "persuade" people they are right. That would also explain the machine guns at the borders to keep people in too.

What's almost funnier is Marx's idea that socialism was a rest stop on the way to communism. So, you have power-mad ruthless dictators murdering 20% of the population in order to "persuade" them. The ruling class takes away all rights and controls all the money. Then they are going to give it all back to the terrified, powerless masses equally so they can all be happy? It's not even nice to point out how stupid and utterly impossible that is. If the ruthless ruling class wanted the people to be free and happy, they would not have butchered them and taken everything from them!

What amazes me the most, considering the bloodthirsty, oppressive, suffocating, and idiotic nature of socialism, and its record of 100% miserable failure, is that it is not banned in every country on earth. The world would be a much happier place, though it would have 275,000,000 more people in it...

No comments:

Post a Comment